11
Writing for the web is different
7 Comments | Posted by Ken Munn in Copywriting, SEO, Search engines, Web Marketing
Take your pick
Pick a piece of online copywriting you like. Even some of mine! Cut and paste it into a new document. Then print and read it. Odds are you’ll find it doesn’t work as well in print as it does in pixels.
Is this harder to read?
Writing for the web is different, because reading a screen is different. It’s harder than reading paper, so work to make web copy less difficult to read. Tempt the visitor to keep going.
Yours sincerely
The web is informal – when did you last see a webpage beginning “To whom it may concern”? Use the first person and active constructions. Take liberties with grammar and construction, as long as you know what you can get away with.
Byte sized*
Break a chunk of copy into short paragraphs – it looks less daunting.
Ask a designer
Any designer will tell you about the advantages of white space. That works on-screen too.
Love spiders
Pepper web content with headlines and sub-heads. It leads the visitor on. And it’s an SEO technique for grabbing spiders.
Key words and phrases
Only humans read print. But web pages are read by stupid software. It doesn’t understand what you’re saying, it just indexes words and phrases. So, repeat key words and phrases more frequently than you’d do for a human reader. However, spiders aren’t going to spend money with you so, for the sake of the humans out there, learn to repeat key words and key phrases unobtrusively.
Pixels, not print
Always proof check for typos and grammaticals by reading your copy as a print out. You’ll see more mistakes that way. Then proof read for sense and readability on screen, because that’s where everybody else will read it.
Keep it short
Bored yet?
*deliberate mispelling. But you knew that anyway.
7 Comments for Writing for the web is different
Wendy Knight | 4 March 2010 at 13:05
Wayne Davies | 9 March 2010 at 08:17
It’s all very well saying “tempt the visitor to keep going”. But how do I do that?
If my product or service is highly technical, and I’m forced to describe it in excruciating detail, what can I possibly say to keep the reader glued to the page?
Hmmm…maybe I need an article about that (hint hint).
Ken Munn | 9 March 2010 at 17:40
Wayne,
Nobody wants to read the technical detail – at least, not up-front. Keep your first level pages benefit-led, and offer a route to techspec on sub pages.
Search Engine Optimization (SEO) News » Blog Archive » Twitter Tweets about seo as of May 18, 2010 | 18 May 2010 at 19:41
[...] SEO Copywriting – the challenges of writing for humans and search engine optimization: http://webmarketingtalk.net/its-different/200/ 2010-05-18 20:39:06 · Reply · View jmgall: Is M.I.A.’s new album title [...]
Ken karnack | 18 May 2010 at 19:44
Hey, I found you on twitter. Great site. maybe we could share ideas?


Hey Ken, great point about search engine spiders. I think we tend to stuff copy with too many keywords in the vain hope that a search engine will put our site at the top of page one.
It’s never happened yet! Meanwhile actual live human beings are forced to struggle their way through difficult copy, or more likely, abandon it altogether. Yet it’s human beings that actually fork over cold hard cash. An SEO dominated approach to the web is arse-backwards.